Book Review



'A Girl Becomes a Comma Like That': Foolish Choices
by Lisa Zeidner

Lisa Glatt’s appealingly dark first novel is another entry in what looks to be an increasingly popular genre, the novel in stories. Seven of the 11 chapters in ''A Girl Becomes a Comma Like That'' serve up slices from the life of Rachel Spark, a discombobulated California poet whose mother is dying of cancer. The remaining chapters dip into the psyches of three other women who are adamantly peripheral to Rachel's first-person narrative.

Glatt's unmoored women, mostly single, share a penchant for having sex with men they don't know. You couldn't call it casual sex; it's far too tense and desperate for that. As a cure for grief or loneliness, these anonymous encounters aren't much of a prescription, but Glatt doesn't moralize about what might lead people to try to drown out their sorrows, or at least distract themselves. Instead, she creates sympathy for these confused, vulnerable women.

''I was over 30 years old, living with my mother because she was sick and because I was poor,'' Rachel reports. Her divorced mother, Elizabeth, faces her diagnosis with cheery fortitude. She dates a fellow cancer patient and even manages to be upbeat about botched breast reconstruction surgery that requires the therapeutic use of bloodsucking leeches (''fat and full—the size of a big man's thumb'') to keep her body from rejecting the new tissue.

In contrast, Rachel, a part-time creative-writing instructor, is dour and directionless, self-pitying and lost. She has no contact with her father, who's remarried and living in New Jersey. Nor does she expect to hear from Rex, the latest in her series of pickup lovers. By the time Rachel knows she's pregnant, Rex is back with his girlfriend on a farm in England. ''Farms are dirty,'' Rachel's mother observes. ''You don't want to be on a farm, honey.''

Fine—but what does Rachel want? Mostly, she just wants her mother to live, and their time together feels like a kind of suspended animation. Rachel doesn't need any more distractions, so a man who's in town for only a couple of days seems just about perfect.

She muses on her history of quickies in the novel's title chapter, the book's strongest and richest. As far back as her first sexual escapade, at the age of 13: ''I was worried even then about being unlovely, unloved. . . . Within minutes of my first kiss I was stripped like a squid and knew he didn't care whether I was Carol from third period or Christine from sixth or bad Brittany who didn't even go to school anymore, and something inside me hardened, turned into a chunk of cement. A girl becomes a comma like that, with wrong boy after wrong boy; she becomes a pause, something quick before the real thing.''

Rachel doesn't tell her mother that she needs an abortion. Instead, she confides in her drinking buddy, Angela Burrows, who gets her own bad-girl chapter in which she leaves a bar with a cigar-smoking stranger. Attempting to blot out memories of a man who deserted her, she succeeds only in transferring this longing to the next fellow: ''Even though she barely liked the nameless stranger, she carried the phone around the house for weeks and prayed for the damn thing to ring.''

At the abortion clinic, Rachel is embarrassed when one of her students, Ella, is assigned to be her caseworker. And Ella herself gets a chapter to brood about the fact that her brand-new husband has already strayed—if kissing her co-worker counts as being unfaithful. Ella's most exasperating repeat customer, 16-year-old Georgia Carter, is given two chapters, in which she reveals a promiscuous sexual history very much like Rachel's.

Because of the novel's patchwork construction, it's not always easy to keep these characters straight, particularly since they don't interact all that much. They pass like ships in the night—once literally in a ship in the night, when Ella and her husband take a ride down a canal in a gondola steered by Daniel, another student of Rachel's, who just happens to have a serious case of puppy love for his professor.

Glatt makes a case that this style of elliptical storytelling is appropriate for her material. Like one-night stands, her chapters don't necessarily lead anywhere. Still, the novel in stories has some disadvantages. By not connecting the dots, Glatt can't fully explore the connections among all these characters.

In the academic world, it's a given that a Ph.D. thesis isn't a book. After young scholars graduate, they're expected to revise their work for publication, creating a more comprehensive overview and digging deeper. Fiction writers who stitch together books from the short stories they've produced for creative-writing workshops are under similar pressure, and since it's much harder to publish story collections than novels, a new genre is born. This isn't to say stories can't be meaningfully linked (Andre Dubus was one celebrated early practitioner), but the novel in stories can be an awkward hybrid, lacking a novel's narrative drive and a story's dense self-enclosure.

The central narrative here—about Rachel's vigil with her dying mother—is the most authentic, substantial and engaging. ''You'll always need a mom, it's in your nature,'' Elizabeth tells Rachel. ''Most girls have had enough mothering at 15, but not you.'' By the end, Rachel manages to arrive at a tenuous autonomy: maybe not a whole paragraph yet, but definitely a lot more than a comma.

Lisa Zeidner is the author of four novels, most recently ''Layover.'' She is a professor of English at Rutgers University in Camden, N.J.